× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Universal credit administration  →  Thread

Gateway UC and contributory benefit

GWRS adviser
forum member

Welfare Rights Service, Greenwich Council, London

Send message

Total Posts: 211

Joined: 8 August 2012

Would anyone be able to give an opinion on the following situation?

- Client with no benefits in payment
- lives in gateway UC area
- eligible for cJSA but not yet claimed
- would like to make claims to cover living expenses and rent costs

Is this person able to make a claim for (old style/standard) cJSA?  This would then take them out of the UC gateway so they could claim Housing Benefit and (if appropriate) ibJSA.

Or will they have to claim new style cJSA and get their living expenses/housing costs met through UC?

Does this just come down to the order in which he makes the claims? So if he claims UC first he would then have to claim new style cJSA with no option for standard cJSA.  If he claims standard cJSA first then he would fall foul of the gateway and then be able to clam legacy benefits.

thanks

MaggieB
forum member

Dorchester CAB

Send message

Total Posts: 271

Joined: 11 October 2010

That’s my understanding of the rules

GWRS adviser
forum member

Welfare Rights Service, Greenwich Council, London

Send message

Total Posts: 211

Joined: 8 August 2012

Thanks Maggie.  So he doesn’t HAVE to claim new style cJSA simply because he lives in a gateway UC area?

HB Anorak
forum member

Benefits consultant/trainer - hbanorak.co.uk, East London

Send message

Total Posts: 2916

Joined: 12 March 2013

I think it would be technically new style JSA, but the key point is that doesn’t compel him to make a claim for UC: having obtained new-style JSA there is nothing to stop him from claiming HB, or vice versa.

For extra belt-and-braces UC avoidance, he claim HB first and then approach DWP while the HB claim is pending: this will mean he fails the “existing benefits” gateway and could not be pushed onto UC even if he wanted.

Mick Quinn
forum member

Welfare rights officer - Northumberland County Council

Send message

Total Posts: 161

Joined: 18 June 2010

HB Anorak - 05 April 2017 12:23 PM

I think it would be technically new style JSA, but the key point is that doesn’t compel him to make a claim for UC: having obtained new-style JSA there is nothing to stop him from claiming HB, or vice versa.

For extra belt-and-braces UC avoidance, he claim HB first and then approach DWP while the HB claim is pending: this will mean he fails the “existing benefits” gateway and could not be pushed onto UC even if he wanted.

If it were done HB claim first, then JSA, wouldn’t the HB claim (with the claimant meeting the gateway conditions) not be taken as a claim for UC?

My understanding is that by making the cbJSA claim first (be it new style or whatever name) would give the claimant the option to claim HB (legacy benefit) or chose to approach the ‘train-wreak’ that is UC.

‘Winter has come North of the Wall’ and White Walkers are appearing…

HB Anorak
forum member

Benefits consultant/trainer - hbanorak.co.uk, East London

Send message

Total Posts: 2916

Joined: 12 March 2013

The HB claim would be exactly that: a claim for HB to the local authority. In live service there is nothing to say you cannot make an HB claim unless you are already a UC claimant as defined in UC TP Reg 6.