× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Work capability issues and ESA  →  Thread

UT decision on work related activity

Andrew Dutton
forum member

Welfare rights service - Derbyshire County Council

Send message

Total Posts: 1964

Joined: 12 October 2012

A colleague of mine represented the claimant on CE/0234/2015 – attached.

This may be helpful to the on-going debate concerning work-related activity especially in the matter of ‘expecting the claimant to identify what the risk would be without knowing what activity would be available or expected or required’


FILE REMOVED FOR EDITING

[ Edited: 13 Oct 2015 at 04:28 pm by Andrew Dutton ]

#1

Paul_Treloar_CPAG
forum member

Advice and Rights Team, Child Poverty Action Group

Send message

Total Posts: 550

Joined: 30 June 2014

You’ve left your client’s name in the decision Andrew.

#2

Andrew Dutton
forum member

Welfare rights service - Derbyshire County Council

Send message

Total Posts: 1964

Joined: 12 October 2012

Curses. Just sent the pdf. Will amend.

#3

Andrew Dutton
forum member

Welfare rights service - Derbyshire County Council

Send message

Total Posts: 1964

Joined: 12 October 2012

Turns out we can’t edit it (which explains a lot) - double-curses - and naughty words

#4

Paul_Treloar_CPAG
forum member

Advice and Rights Team, Child Poverty Action Group

Send message

Total Posts: 550

Joined: 30 June 2014

If you send it to me, I think we might have a version of Adobe that does allow editing.

#5

Paul_Treloar_CPAG
forum member

Advice and Rights Team, Child Poverty Action Group

Send message

Total Posts: 550

Joined: 30 June 2014

Here’s an edited version Andrew.

File Attachments

Our webtools:

rightsnet community

News & case law updates

About rightsnet

Privacy and legal

Website by MID