× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Disability benefits  →  Thread

Deaf Clients

Lynsey Grubb
forum member

Welfare Rights Team, Dundee City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 4

Joined: 21 July 2010

Hi,

I’m posting this after delivering some training locally where I was asked about how deaf people access and claim PIP (i.e can’t phone and no on-line facilities) are DWP helping with these? are agencies supplying interpreter’s? etc??

I wondered if anyone could share their experiences so that I can feed these back

Thanks

Peter Turville
forum member

Welfare rights worker - Oxford Community Work Agency

Send message

Total Posts: 1659

Joined: 18 June 2010

I have asked DWP the same question. They were unable to give an answer beyond access via the textphone number and that they have special provisions (unspecified) to identify ‘vulnerable’ claimants. I am aware that many deaf clients (particlarly BSL users) do not / cannot use textphones for various reasons.

You may find the thread about requesting paper PIP claim forms by letter useful.

Altered Chaos
forum member

Operations & Advice Manager - Citizens Advice Taunton

Send message

Total Posts: 427

Joined: 28 June 2010

Our local DWP visiting team will visit Deaf/BSL users with an interpreter to assist with claims etc however there is no direct route for clients to contact them, so they go through us and then I contact the local JCP - not ideal and it is something I am working on… the DWP really ought to have this as a priority especially given their public sector equality duties and that UC is supposed to be an on-line management of claims system.

Lynsey Grubb
forum member

Welfare Rights Team, Dundee City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 4

Joined: 21 July 2010

Thanks - I’ll feed this back

Dan_Manville
forum member

Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 2262

Joined: 15 October 2012

Altered Chaos - 28 August 2013 03:17 PM

Our local DWP visiting team will visit Deaf/BSL users with an interpreter to assist with claims etc however there is no direct route for clients to contact them, so they go through us and then I contact the local JCP - not ideal and it is something I am working on… the DWP really ought to have this as a priority especially given their public sector equality duties and that UC is supposed to be an on-line management of claims system.

They have told us it is a “priority”... The guidance we were given for people who could not use a telephone was that they could press the hash key as an indicator that they gave consent for a third party to speak on their behalf. They appreciate the shortcomings of that advice but it was an improvement on “ask them to grunt down the phone” which was it’s predecessor.

nevip
forum member

Welfare rights adviser - Sefton Council, Liverpool

Send message

Total Posts: 3137

Joined: 16 June 2010

You would have hoped that the DWP has moved on since this happened.

http://archive.disabilitynow.org.uk/search/z02_09_Se/eagle.shtml

annief
forum member

Benefits adviser - Maggie's Centre, Edinburgh

Send message

Total Posts: 107

Joined: 5 November 2012

DManville - 29 August 2013 10:45 AM
Altered Chaos - 28 August 2013 03:17 PM

Our local DWP visiting team will visit Deaf/BSL users with an interpreter to assist with claims etc however there is no direct route for clients to contact them, so they go through us and then I contact the local JCP - not ideal and it is something I am working on… the DWP really ought to have this as a priority especially given their public sector equality duties and that UC is supposed to be an on-line management of claims system.

They have told us it is a “priority”... The guidance we were given for people who could not use a telephone was that they could press the hash key as an indicator that they gave consent for a third party to speak on their behalf. They appreciate the shortcomings of that advice but it was an improvement on “ask them to grunt down the phone” which was it’s predecessor.

I actually had a client who had a larygectomy and they ‘allowed’ her to press the hash key in acknowledgement, whilst I answered the questions on her behalf. Don’t know how they could tell if it was her pressing the key…....

Mike Hughes
forum member

Senior welfare rights officer - Salford City Council Welfare Rights Service

Send message

Total Posts: 3138

Joined: 17 June 2010

annief - 29 August 2013 02:21 PM
DManville - 29 August 2013 10:45 AM
Altered Chaos - 28 August 2013 03:17 PM

Our local DWP visiting team will visit Deaf/BSL users with an interpreter to assist with claims etc however there is no direct route for clients to contact them, so they go through us and then I contact the local JCP - not ideal and it is something I am working on… the DWP really ought to have this as a priority especially given their public sector equality duties and that UC is supposed to be an on-line management of claims system.

They have told us it is a “priority”... The guidance we were given for people who could not use a telephone was that they could press the hash key as an indicator that they gave consent for a third party to speak on their behalf. They appreciate the shortcomings of that advice but it was an improvement on “ask them to grunt down the phone” which was it’s predecessor.

I actually had a client who had a larygectomy and they ‘allowed’ her to press the hash key in acknowledgement, whilst I answered the questions on her behalf. Don’t know how they could tell if it was her pressing the key…....

Clearly this is where that iPhone 5S fingerprint tech. will come into its own :)