× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Work capability issues and ESA  →  Thread

Wolverhampton mail handling losing med certs?

 1 2 > 

MaggieB
forum member

Dorchester CAB

Send message

Total Posts: 271

Joined: 11 October 2010

Are any other advisers experiencing increasing numbers of med certs “not being received” by local processing centre after being sent to Wolverhampton post handling sites. There does not appear to be any process for Wolverhampton to link these to claim. Most seem to be taking 10 days or so to get to processing but we are seeing more and more going missing with expected results. Does anyone have any insider knowledge of how mail is being handled at these huge sites?
One wonders why the “digital by default” agenda doesn’t apply to the internal workings of the DWP..

1964
forum member

Deputy Manager, Reading Community Welfare Rights Unit

Send message

Total Posts: 1711

Joined: 16 June 2010

We’re experiencing the same problem- in fact, in general I would say that one out of every three pieces of correspondence disappears into the Wolverhampton Black Hole (and what does get through takes a good couple of weeks to be logged as received by the local BC).

I, too, would be most interested to know what the Wolverhampton post handling site set-up is. Are there any Googlemap arial pics of it for example?

Dan_Manville
forum member

Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 2262

Joined: 15 October 2012

It’s part of the West Midlands Royal Mail handling centre. Google pics would reveal nought but one big roof.

Paul_Treloar
forum member

Welfare benefits caseworker, Mary Ward Legal Centre

Send message

Total Posts: 148

Joined: 18 October 2013

Same as above, all mail sent via this route is very unpredictable as to whether it ever gets received, not aided by the stock response when you call to follow up and are told that correspondence won’t be logged onto the system until at least 14 working days have expired, meaning it’s often 3 weeks before you’re told that they haven’t received it and can you send everything again…..

elaineforrest
forum member

Benefits specialist - Dumfries & Galloway Citizens Advice

Send message

Total Posts: 64

Joined: 16 June 2010

It really is appalling.
Everything DWP do to “improve” their systems creates nothing but chaos.
It’s like they are putting more and more obstacles in the way so people just give up trying to contact them. First it was the useless telephone contact centres, and now the same with snail mail.

Dan_Manville
forum member

Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 2262

Joined: 15 October 2012

Welcome to Workfare

Andrew Dutton
forum member

Welfare rights service - Derbyshire County Council

Send message

Total Posts: 1964

Joined: 12 October 2012

You have something there! Force claimants to work in Wolverhampton for no money, sorting their own mail! And delivering the replies to themselves!

Ben E Fitz
forum member

Welfare Benefits Caseworker, Manchester CAB Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 162

Joined: 17 June 2010

“It really is appalling.
Everything DWP do to “improve” their systems creates nothing but chaos.
It’s like they are putting more and more obstacles in the way so people just give up trying to contact them. First it was the useless telephone contact centres, and now the same with snail mail.”

It’s what they mean by “frustrating” claimants off benefits. IMHO its totally deliberate.

benefitsadviser
forum member

Sunderland West Advice Project

Send message

Total Posts: 1003

Joined: 22 June 2010

I went to a DWP meeting on April 1st (honest)

They admitted that Wolverhampton wasnt working as intended and apologised for any inconvenience. They apologised to us advisers. Not claimants. advisers…............

I then spoke to DWP ESA call centre on a different matter (Med3 missing) and was told by a delightful young man that the reason for the delay was not Wolverhampton, as there was “absolutely nothing wrong with the mail handling site and that EVERY document is scanned and sent to the right BDC” , basically blaming my client for their mess.

I told him that our experiences obviously differed and he politely inferred I was just stirring and lying as Wolverhampton was great.

sigh…......................

Ben E Fitz
forum member

Welfare Benefits Caseworker, Manchester CAB Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 162

Joined: 17 June 2010

In that case, (DWP persons reading this please take note!!!), why can’t/won’t jobcentres scan and email documents to relevant BDC and avoid the cost and inefficiency of using Wolverhampton at all?

Gods forbid that claimants could actually take documents to the relevant BDC in person, as used to be possible?

The system is designed specifically to put more hurdles in claimant’s way and to provide the maximum possibility for delays or a failed claim.

As for expecting an apology to claimants…..forget it!! Remember that they are all feckless scroungers undeserving of common courtesy, whereas advisers are (very) “hard-working people”!!!!

Peter Turville
forum member

Welfare rights worker - Oxford Community Work Agency

Send message

Total Posts: 1659

Joined: 18 June 2010

Ben E Fitz - 12 June 2014 02:38 PM

.....whereas advisers are (very) “hard-working people”!!!!

That is working ever harder in order to sort out DWPs (HMRC’s / HMCTS’s / LA’s) ever increasing level of maladministration of the benefit system!

BC Welfare Rights
forum member

The Brunswick Centre, Kirklees & Calderdale

Send message

Total Posts: 1366

Joined: 22 July 2013

It’s not just Wolverhampton either. Recently I have had clients whose Pension Credit forms were completed by DWP visiting officers and subsequently lost, requiring a further home visit and lengthy delay in processing; a pile of numerous bank statements that were in the possession of a BDC for a time (they wrote to client questioning something about them) and then lost; ESA50s that have been scanned into the system and referred to by the telephony team and then lost (described as ‘not available’) when it comes to Tribunal papers, etc.

What is puzzling is that all the paperwork must be somewhere, it doesn’t just disappear. What does the DWP do with the masses of orphan papers that must be floating around somewhere? Put it in the recycling? Destroy it? Bung it in black bags and throw it on the pile? Build a bigger warehouse to keep it? Someone must come across it at some point and wonder why there are 5 million sacks of paper that no-one has claimed, what do they do then?

I was wondering whether this is something I could refer to the Information Commissioner as a complaint. It is after all highly sensitive and confidential info that could be of great use to fraudsters, spammers and identity thieves. I had a quick look at the terms of ref but got distracted and haven’t revisited it yet. Anyone ever tried?

Liz S
forum member

Welfare specialist and appeals officer - Herefordshire Council Welfare Rights Team

Send message

Total Posts: 179

Joined: 17 June 2010

Can the med certs be taken into local JCP office?

Ben E Fitz
forum member

Welfare Benefits Caseworker, Manchester CAB Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 162

Joined: 17 June 2010

They can, but only with a pre-booked appointment and the Jobcentre Staff will try their hardest to put clients off. Stating that it’s not an effective use of their time etc etc.

nevip
forum member

Welfare rights adviser - Sefton Council, Liverpool

Send message

Total Posts: 3135

Joined: 16 June 2010

And you would be increasing the risk.  The Royal Mail is a lot less likely to lose the post in transit than the DWP’s internal mail system.

Ben E Fitz
forum member

Welfare Benefits Caseworker, Manchester CAB Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 162

Joined: 17 June 2010

Should have made clear, these appointments are for documents to be scanned and emailed to BDCs.