× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Disability benefits  →  Thread

DLA overpayment

Pete C
forum member

Pete at CAB

Send message

Total Posts: 556

Joined: 18 June 2010

I have a client who was overpaid DLA because they did not notify that they were in hospital. The admissions were acute psychiatric admissions under the MHA and I am looking for some case law that might distinguish the acute admission of a delusional patient from Sec of State v B which has been cited in the appeal bundle. I thought there had already been a thread on this subject but I can’t seem to find it.

thanks

Pete C
forum member

Pete at CAB

Send message

Total Posts: 556

Joined: 18 June 2010

Thanks, the tread is very informative but not very encouraging to the arguments I had in mind!

nevip
forum member

Welfare rights adviser - Sefton Council, Liverpool

Send message

Total Posts: 3135

Joined: 16 June 2010

Given that the upper tribunal has just found for three claimants under the Mental Capacity Act I would try to construct a discrimination argument.  It has to be tested one way or the other.

That should read, the Equality Act, and not the Mental Capacity Act.

[ Edited: 7 Jun 2013 at 01:12 pm by nevip ]
ClaireHodgson
forum member

Solicitor, CMH solicitors, Tyne And Wear

Send message

Total Posts: 186

Joined: 17 June 2010

As people are aware, I think the Mental Capacity Act has massive relevance here .  Re B was before that came in and so could not have been cited.  construct an argument on the MCA.

It cannot be right, given the MCA, that someone who doesn’t have capacity should be held to the same standard as someone who does.

clearly, if someone never has capacity one would expect them to have an appointee or CoP Deputy, but where the incapacity is of sudden onset?