× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Other benefit issues  →  Thread

Government blocks publication of names of ‘workfare’ employers

Paul Treloar
forum member

Head of Policy, LASA

Send message

Total Posts: 842

Joined: 6 January 2011

Further to the rightsnet story Less than half of Work Programme sub-contractors are from the voluntary sector, the Guardian has reported that the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) is refusing to publish the names of charities and businesses involved in the mandatory work activity programme. They say that following a request from the information commissioner, the DWP has said that the government’s mandatory work programme would “collapse” if the names were made public due to the likelihood of protests against the organisations involved.

In August, the commissioner ruled that the names should be released. However, in a 14-page appeal document leaked to the Guardian, DWP lawyers argue that the details of companies and charities involved in the mandatory work activity scheme – which compels unemployed people to do 30 hours of unpaid labour a week in order to retain their jobseeker’s allowance – must remain secret. Government lawyers say the entire scheme would have come unhinged had they released placement details at the time of the request because campaign groups would have focused their protests and forced the charities and businesses involved to withdraw.

For the whole article, see Government blocks publication of names of ‘workfare’ employers

bigbill
forum member

Dumfries Welfare Rights

Send message

Total Posts: 127

Joined: 24 June 2010

Should be easy for people reading this to start adding local names of who is involved on here?

seand
forum member

Welfare rights officer - Wheatley Homes

Send message

Total Posts: 302

Joined: 16 June 2010

i might be wrong, but aren’t those just Work Programme sub and sub-sub-contractors, and not necessarily those doing manditory work activity?