× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Housing costs  →  Thread

UC and temporary absence from home

SamW
forum member

Lambeth Every Pound Counts

Send message

Total Posts: 433

Joined: 26 July 2012

Hi all,

Client is in hospital and approaching the 6 month temporary absence limit for her UC housing costs. My understanding is that she is some way off being able to return home permanently but may be well enough to manage brief stays as part of her rehabilitation process.

I was wondering if the HB caselaw re the issue of what constitutes a ‘reset’ in the temporary absence period is likely to remain relevant for UC?

Any thoughts would be much appreciated :) !

S

stevemac
forum member

Horsham CAB, West Sussex

Send message

Total Posts: 117

Joined: 24 April 2012

I believe that similar to HB , a short return home ( possibly as little as 24 hrs) can restart a new period of temp absence

 

Va1der
forum member

Welfare Rights Officer with SWAMP Glasgow

Send message

Total Posts: 706

Joined: 7 May 2019

None of my reference materials cite any specific caselaw etc for UC, they all rely on the R v Penwith case from 1990, indicating 24h is sufficient.

I wonder though if UC would try the argument that a change within an AP isn’t relevant, and so still treat her as absent without interruption?

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and advice resources - Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 3211

Joined: 7 January 2016

Va1der - 26 January 2022 12:12 PM

None of my reference materials cite any specific caselaw etc for UC, they all rely on the R v Penwith case from 1990, indicating 24h is sufficient.

I wonder though if UC would try the argument that a change within an AP isn’t relevant, and so still treat her as absent without interruption?

Can’t see it myself. The regulations state:

Periods of temporary absence exceeding 6 months
9.—(1) Subject to sub-paragraphs (2) and (3), a claimant is to be treated as no longer occupying accommodation from which they are temporarily absent where the absence exceeds, or is expected to exceed, 6 months.

Six months is a quantifiable period of time that doesn’t have reference to a specific AIP - you’re either going to be absent for more than six months or you’re not. None of the terms seem to be defined in the interpretation reg so they must be given their normal meaning.

So if someone comes home for a 24-hour period overnight, I’d say it’s strongly arguable that their absence hasn’t exceeded six months, provided that happens within the six month period, iyswim?

stevemac
forum member

Horsham CAB, West Sussex

Send message

Total Posts: 117

Joined: 24 April 2012

I have only had 1 of these cases so far, my client came back home for 48 hours and UC agreed to re-start the temp absence

SamW
forum member

Lambeth Every Pound Counts

Send message

Total Posts: 433

Joined: 26 July 2012

Hi all, sorry for delay coming back to you - many thanks for the responses much appreciated 😊