× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Work capability issues and ESA  →  Thread

My Dan Manville moment

BC Welfare Rights
forum member

The Brunswick Centre, Kirklees & Calderdale

Send message

Total Posts: 1366

Joined: 22 July 2013

I am having a bit of a Dan Manville ‘did I dream it?’ moment.

I’m sure that I read fairly recently (last year or so?) an FOI or Parliamentary statement about the number of WCAs that were conducted as home visits. From memory the number was extremely low, perhaps 2% or 3%. I cannot for the life of me find this info now when I need it in connection with an MR.

Can anyone point me to it or was it a DM inspired dream?

Many thanks.

Elliot Kent
forum member

Shelter

Send message

Total Posts: 3134

Joined: 14 July 2014

This was in the work and pensions select committee report on PIP and ESA assessments.

26. The Department forwards claimants’ application forms to the relevant contractor on receipt. For a minority of claimants, the decision on entitlement is made on the basis of paper evidence alone. In most cases, however, the contractor will contact the claimant to arrange a face-to-face assessment. Claimants who are unable to attend an assessment centre can request their assessment be carried out at home. The decision on whether this takes place is made by contractors’ Healthcare Professionals (HCPs). Home visit rates vary widely between contractors. Capita carried out 56% of its assessments at claimants’ homes in 2016. This compared to 14.5% for Atos and just 1% for Maximus. Maximus explained that if medical evidence suggested impairment sufficient to justify a home visit, the HCP might judge that they have enough information to make recommendations on the claimant’s fitness for work, without a face-to-face assessment taking place at all. The reason for the large difference between Atos and Capita’s rates was not entirely clear to us, although David Haley, Chief Executive of Atos, explained that it might result from “slight” differences in the location and capacity of assessment centres between the two contractors. Capita carries out a much smaller proportion of PIP assessments than Atos. Atos’s approach to granting home visits will therefore have implications for a much larger group of claimants.

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmworpen/829/829.pdf

 

Mike Hughes
forum member

Senior welfare rights officer - Salford City Council Welfare Rights Service

Send message

Total Posts: 3138

Joined: 17 June 2010

Is this what you were looking for?

https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2019-06-26/269649/

I think Shawn needs to give serious consideration to closing some of the Covid-19 social forums but maybe starting one called “Dan Manville Dreamt It”.

BC Welfare Rights
forum member

The Brunswick Centre, Kirklees & Calderdale

Send message

Total Posts: 1366

Joined: 22 July 2013

Excellent, thank you dream diviners