× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Covid-19 issues  →  Thread

Self employed and Coronavirus and UC

JoW
forum member

Financial inclusion manager - Wythenshawe Community Housing

Send message

Total Posts: 343

Joined: 7 September 2012

We are seeing people who are losing business due to Coronavirus ie self employed cleaners where offices are closing so don’t need cleaning. Do changes to MIF apply or is it only if self employed person is self isolating or infected?

Abi Sheridan
forum member

Expert Advice Team (Help to Claim) - Citizens Advice

Send message

Total Posts: 26

Joined: 26 April 2019

The legal changes only apply to someone ill or self-isolating, not who’s businesses have been affected.
Having said that, we are hearing stories of the MIF not being applied at the moment, but thats really just up to the work coach. When I’m doing benefit checks, I quote both figures to people and explain to them what the MIF is and that its imposition is up to the work coach.
Its one of the things national Citizens Advice are calling on the Govt to change: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/Global/CitizensAdvice/welfare%20publications/Citizens%20Advice%20briefing%20-%20Covid-19%20pandemic%20(1).pdf

Ianb
forum member

Macmillan benefits team, Citizens Advice Bristol

Send message

Total Posts: 958

Joined: 24 November 2017

New package being announced suspends MIF completely. See https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewthread/15760/

SG LB C
forum member

Income Maximisation Team LB Camden

Send message

Total Posts: 46

Joined: 23 August 2018

This might be stupid, but the means test is still going to apply right?

I mean, for example an employee with 30k savings could stop work and either receive full pay, 80% pay or SSP with no means testing. However a self employed person in the same boat with 30k will be means tested under UC?

 

Benefits38
forum member

Welfare Benefits Team, The Money Carer Foundation

Send message

Total Posts: 32

Joined: 9 October 2018

SG LB C - 23 March 2020 08:09 AM

This might be stupid, but the means test is still going to apply right?

I mean, for example an employee with 30k savings could stop work and either receive full pay, 80% pay or SSP with no means testing. However a self employed person in the same boat with 30k will be means tested under UC?

Unfortunately, you are correct.  Universal Credit is still means tested.

SG LB C
forum member

Income Maximisation Team LB Camden

Send message

Total Posts: 46

Joined: 23 August 2018

Benefits38 - 23 March 2020 09:26 AM
SG LB C - 23 March 2020 08:09 AM

This might be stupid, but the means test is still going to apply right?

I mean, for example an employee with 30k savings could stop work and either receive full pay, 80% pay or SSP with no means testing. However a self employed person in the same boat with 30k will be means tested under UC?

Unfortunately, you are correct.  Universal Credit is still means tested.

Many thanks, as I thought.

Pernish
forum member

Welwyn Hatfield CAB - Adviser

Send message

Total Posts: 75

Joined: 13 May 2014

News from Gov UK of increase to Working Tax Credit from 6 April

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/increase-to-working-tax-credits-what-this-means


Will this mean claim for UC avoided for at least some people - hope so…

Pernish
forum member

Welwyn Hatfield CAB - Adviser

Send message

Total Posts: 75

Joined: 13 May 2014

I don’t understand this Coronavirus Bill and s/e people. The draft Ive seen is here https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0122/amend/coronavirus_daily_cwh_0320rev.14-18.html?fbclid=IwAR13QIhA3FUor-cMv3ryuwfsNCYzXsAv0hCrtSg40IWjq9qnGJY1U36qggM
But the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme is not compulsory so s/e would be in a much better position than workers who can only get the 80% if their employer chooses to join the scheme.
Or perhaps I’m missing something.

Ruth Knox
forum member

Vauxhall Law Centre

Send message

Total Posts: 559

Joined: 27 January 2014

this help for self-employed shouldn’t be means tested unless they make a claim for UC.?  As with the employees package, wouldn’t it work as a kind of tax rebate - with the government using the HMRC records to pay the 80% rate. But what about self-employed who don’t have a three year history?  It sounds at present as if nothing is available for them.

Gareth Morgan
forum member

CEO, Ferret, Cardiff

Send message

Total Posts: 2004

Joined: 16 June 2010

What’s the status of people who are IR35?

Ianb
forum member

Macmillan benefits team, Citizens Advice Bristol

Send message

Total Posts: 958

Joined: 24 November 2017

Ianb - 20 March 2020 05:48 PM

New package being announced suspends MIF completely. See https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewthread/15760/

Contrary to what I thought when I posted that based on the headline announcement it appears that Abi was right when she said

Abi Sheridan - 20 March 2020 04:12 PM

The legal changes only apply to someone ill or self-isolating, not who’s businesses have been affected.

The new Memo ADM 02/20 says the MIF is suspended if the claimant is treated as having LCW as a result of being affected by coronavirus. Being affected by coronavirus dos not include loss of income or business as a result of economic disruption caused by coronavirus. My reading of this is that any healthy self employed person who has not been advised to isolate is still subject to the MIF even if they have no earnings.

Lets hope this is a case of the DWP not yet having caught up with the intention of the chancellor.

Charles
forum member

Accountant, Haffner Hoff Ltd, Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 1421

Joined: 27 February 2019

Ianb - 24 March 2020 04:36 PM

Lets hope this is a case of the DWP not yet having caught up with the intention of the chancellor.

I’m pretty certain this is the case. To be honest, the current legal position is as stated in the ADM, as they haven’t legislated yet for the more recent changes.

Ianb
forum member

Macmillan benefits team, Citizens Advice Bristol

Send message

Total Posts: 958

Joined: 24 November 2017

Charles - 24 March 2020 06:32 PM
Ianb - 24 March 2020 04:36 PM

Lets hope this is a case of the DWP not yet having caught up with the intention of the chancellor.

I’m pretty certain this is the case. To be honest, the current legal position is as stated in the ADM, as they haven’t legislated yet for the more recent changes.

Fingers crossed. Certainly in his speech on 20th March Rishi Sunak said “I’m strengthening the safety net for self-employed people too, by suspending the minimum income floor for everyone affected by the ECONOMIC impacts of coronavirus.”
It’s clear the current bill to which the Memo refers doesn’t do this.