Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Disability benefits  →  Thread

DLA/PIP resuming after stay in care

 

The CASA
forum member

Community Advice Services Association

Send message

Total Posts: 15

Joined: 6 May 2018

Client came out of care 3+ years ago but only had DLA reinstated in January this year. Client has severe learning difficulties. Is the onus on the family to notify DWP she has left care or as I suspect the nursing home will have notified them on her discharge?

     
Jane O-P
forum member

Parkinson's UK

Send message

Total Posts: 35

Joined: 31 July 2017

Is/was there no appointee? If neither the family nor the nursing home were her appointee then it isn’t really their responsibility.

Was she getting (and been financially assessed for) non resi care after leaving resi care? If so why wasn’t this picked up at the financial assessment?

Jane

     
NeverSayNo
forum member

Northumbria Healthcare, Welfare Rights Dept.

Send message

Total Posts: 121

Joined: 21 December 2011

If I’m reading the circ’s correctly then you could go with an argument that whenever the claimant/appointee reported the fact she was out of residential care then the DWP should “unsuspend” the DLA care component and pay DLA arrears right from when she left care.

DWP may argue that the claimant is under a responsibility to report changes of circumstances and that by law they can only pay back arrears for 1mth. They are not correct.

Have a look at CDLA/2807/2003 and CDLA/3816/2013 (I have copies of both if you want to DM me with an email address) which basically state that even if the DWP have not suspended DLA care when in residential care but rather have stopped entitlement altogether then they should not have done that and a tribunal can revisit that decision to correct the error.

Have had a lot of success with this at tribunal - but you have to have the patience to push it that far.

     
Dan Manville
forum member

Mental health, Wolverhampton CC Welfare Rights

Send message

Total Posts: 1957

Joined: 15 October 2012

Payability when in care is a separate test than entitlement. Payability is not governed by the Social Security Act which lays down rules for revision, supersession etc; there is no equivalent provision for payability. There are no requirements about notifying promptly where payability is in issue rather than entitlement.

I see a lot of this when people are discharged from hosapital but still aren’t particularly well so don’t notify PIP they’ve been discharged. Pointing out the above has never failed to yield payment of the full arrears owing.

     
The CASA
forum member

Community Advice Services Association

Send message

Total Posts: 15

Joined: 6 May 2018

Thanks for your advice and assistance

     
The CASA
forum member

Community Advice Services Association

Send message

Total Posts: 15

Joined: 6 May 2018

Is there any mileage in the facts that the claimant’s ESA was reduced when in care. Then increased when she left care..