× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Decision making and appeals  →  Thread

CE-File practice direction

BCD
forum member

Kirklees council

Send message

Total Posts: 49

Joined: 23 March 2023

Re https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/welfare-rights/news/item/requirement-for-professional-representatives-to-use-ce-file-when-providing-documents-to-the-administrative-chamber-of-the-upper-tribunal

“In any proceedings that are started in the Tribunal on or after 4 December 2023, any document provided to the Tribunal by a party who is represented by a legal representative in the proceedings or is a body amenable to judicial review must be provided using CE-File.”

The Tribunal procedure Rules (Upper Tribunal) 2008 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/2698/article/11 defines legal representative as:
“In this rule “legal representative” means a person who, for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007, is an authorised person in relation to an activity which constitutes the exercise of a right of audience or the conduct of litigation within the meaning of that Act.”

What about ‘a body amenable to judicial review’? Local authorities? Who else?

Elliot Kent
forum member

Shelter

Send message

Total Posts: 3134

Joined: 14 July 2014

Broadly, a public authority who could be on the receiving end of a JR. Materially that will be the SSWP, HMRC and LAs exercising HB functions. It would also apply to other bodies who might litigate in the UT (AAC) such as the Disclosure and Barring Service and Defence Secretary.

However the wording of the provision is that it will only apply to a party who is amenable to judicial review; so not to a member of the public. Representation by an LA doesn’t make a difference.

For completeness, I would also point out that there is a difference between a “legal representative” and a “representative” and most people on this forum will be “representatives” but not “legal representatives” so are not subject to the direction.

BCD
forum member

Kirklees council

Send message

Total Posts: 49

Joined: 23 March 2023

Elliot Kent - 16 October 2023 01:18 PM

However the wording of the provision is that it will only apply to a party who is amenable to judicial review; so not to a member of the public. Representation by an LA doesn’t make a difference.

So, if I understand you correctly, you saying that if the LA is the respondent in the proceedings the direction applies but if the appellant is being represented by a LA advice worker it doesn’t?

Elliot Kent
forum member

Shelter

Send message

Total Posts: 3134

Joined: 14 July 2014

Yes, unless the local authority rep is a solicitor acting as such etc.

It says:

“In any proceedings that are started in the Tribunal on or after 4 December 2023, any document provided to the Tribunal by a party who is represented by a legal representative in the proceedings or is a body amenable to judicial review must be provided using CE-File.”

i.e.

“a party who is represented by a legal representative in the proceedings” or “a party [...] who is a body amenable to judicial review”

shawn mach
Administrator

rightsnet.org.uk

Send message

Total Posts: 3782

Joined: 14 April 2010

In case of interest ... we’ve just listed a couple of webinars on the new Practice Direction:

https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/training-and-events#Upper-Tribunal-Administrative-Appeals-Chamber