× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Universal credit administration  →  Thread

Couples benefit cap has been reduced from £26,000 to £18,000 in Universal Credit  

Gareth Morgan
forum member

CEO, Ferret, Cardiff

Send message

Total Posts: 2009

Joined: 16 June 2010

I’ve just finished off the 2014 version of our Future Benefits Model (FFBM) and sat back to watch yesterday’s Work & Pensions Question Time.  Lots of raising again the spectre of a cut in the benefits cap from £26K to £20K.  I’ve written a lot about this in the past and published a set of tables for every area in Britain showing the effects of such a cut.

They’ve now done it for childless couples in Universal Credit! 

The regulations haven’t been amended yet but the benefits rates for 2014 / 2015 have moved such couples into the lower £350 a week band.

See the details and some thoughts on whether it’s a drafting error at my blog at http://blog.cix.co.uk/gmorgan

Jon Shaw
forum member

Welfare Rights Service, CPAG

Send message

Total Posts: 98

Joined: 25 June 2010

One of our London team queried this, and the reply from DWP was as follows.

‘Thank you for spotting this error. We can confirm this is a typological error and not a policy change. We will correct this mistake at the earliest opportunity.’

Impresssively detailed typographical error…

Jon

Gareth Morgan
forum member

CEO, Ferret, Cardiff

Send message

Total Posts: 2009

Joined: 16 June 2010

Jon Shaw - 21 January 2014 10:40 AM

We can confirm this is a typological error

Did they actually say typological?  I think that means the current state predicts the future, in theological terms.  Hmm?

 

Jon Shaw
forum member

Welfare Rights Service, CPAG

Send message

Total Posts: 98

Joined: 25 June 2010

Ha! Didn’t even spot that, just automatically read it as ‘typographical’ and copied and pasted it straight into my post.

Martin Williams
forum member

Welfare rights advisor - CPAG, London

Send message

Total Posts: 772

Joined: 16 June 2010

Gareth Morgan - 21 January 2014 11:44 AM
Jon Shaw - 21 January 2014 10:40 AM

We can confirm this is a typological error

Did they actually say typological?  I think that means the current state predicts the future, in theological terms.  Hmm?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typology_(disambiguation)  (sorry link doesn’t work as it leaves out the last “)”).

Unless we mean teleological?

[ Edited: 21 Jan 2014 at 04:00 pm by Martin Williams ]
shawn mach
Administrator

rightsnet.org.uk

Send message

Total Posts: 3794

Joined: 14 April 2010

nice work guys ... ... here’s steve webb’s ministerial statement acknowledging and correcting the error -

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140127/wmstext/140127m0001.htm#1401271000006