× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Disability benefits  →  Thread

PIP appealing only one component

Sophia2013
forum member

Redbridge Citizens Advice

Send message

Total Posts: 44

Joined: 9 July 2013

Hi, I have a client who is in receipt of PIP standard rate, she now wants to appeal the decision but she says she does not want to appeal her daily living entitlement only want to appeal the non-entitlement of mobility comp.  Is that possible? I thought if you appeal your claim will be looked at afresh one no matter what. Please help. Thank you in advance.

[ Edited: 20 Sep 2016 at 12:21 pm by shawn mach ]
generalistadviser29
forum member

Birmingham Citizens Advice Bureau

Send message

Total Posts: 24

Joined: 4 July 2014

I think you are right Sophia. That you can’t just appeal one component. But I would be interested to hear if it possible to do that from more experienced posters on here.

Cheers,

A

Victor
forum member

Welfare Rights Officer, Stockport Council

Send message

Total Posts: 88

Joined: 17 June 2010

Definitely not possible.

I had a client only recently who went to tribunal (against my advice) wanting mob and came away having lost her DL (and thus also SDP)

Jon (CANY)
forum member

Welfare benefits - Craven CAB, North Yorkshire

Send message

Total Posts: 1362

Joined: 16 June 2010

You could try Pete C’s approach, from a recent thread:

http://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewreply/46842/

Elliot Kent
forum member

Shelter

Send message

Total Posts: 3139

Joined: 14 July 2014

You can’t just appeal one component but equally the Tribunal’s job isn’t to start from a blank slate as such.

Tribunals are, by default, concerned only with the issues raised by an appeal. If the only issue raised by your grounds is the distance you can walk, then in the course of things that is the only issue “raised by the appeal” and the Tribunal is not called on to consider anything else.

Tribunals do have a discretion to go beyond that function and consider other issues of entitlement (e.g. looking at an existing daily living award) but they should only do that deliberately and where it is appropriate in the case - for instance if the evidence backing up the award is completely incredible. It is a discretion too - some panels will frequently look into the other component whilst others prefer to leave it alone whatever the evidence.

Importantly, for a savvy or represented appellant, there are various cases to the effect that a Tribunal proposing to investigate and potentially remove an existing award must put the appellant on notice that they are considering doing that before it is too late. This provides an opportunity to either sure up the case on the daily living award or withdraw the appeal.

So there are risks but they are often manageable - its not the case that the award is just given up and everyone starts again.

Sophia2013
forum member

Redbridge Citizens Advice

Send message

Total Posts: 44

Joined: 9 July 2013

Thank you so much, love you all