Winder and Ors v Sandwell

However.

http://www.lgcplus.com/briefings/corporate-core/legal/sandwell-very-likely-to-challenge-benefits-ruling/5073618.article?blocktitle=Most-commented&contentID=-1

And, did you know that Wednesbury is in Sandwell?  Must be something in the water.

Thanks Paul, hadn’t spotted that one.

And I didn’t know about Wednesbury and Sandwell but I do now, so that’s my learning for the day.

Interesting that Cllr Cooper is quoted in the LGC article as saying that census data shows most people have lived in Sandwell “for a long time”.

So….a minimum residence requirement for CTR would seem very much like a solution in search of a problem then…?

nevip - 08 August 2014 03:32 PM

And, did you know that Wednesbury is in Sandwell?  Must be something in the water.

and Bilston is in Wolverhampton and Sutton Coldfield is in Birmingham; they’re somewhat irrational with their Local Authorities round these parts…

We have been informed that Sandwell Council do not intend to lodge a further appeal against this decision.

This is not going away.

http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2014/08/waiting-wait/