Transitional SDP reduced
This might be correct but seems wrong so looking for confirmation either way?
Client moved to UC with £120 trans SDP included, rent had a service charge at £100 which was mentioned at start of UC claim but not added until 2 months later once checked and confirmed by UC.
This added service charge has now reduced the trans amount by £100 which seems wrong as if was there at the start and had it been included in the first UC payment would not have reduced the trans amount.
What matters is whether or not the original awarding decision for the first AP has been revised.
If it has been revised so as to include the extra £100, then there shouldn’t be any issue re SDP comp erosion. However, if the extra £100 has only been included from some later date via supersession, then that would trigger erosion.
Your post seems to imply that the extra £100 has only been put into place at some later date, but it is not obvious why that would be. If it is just a case of getting confirmation of the liability, why haven’t they just put that into place from the start of the award?
Many thanks Elliot I will double check