× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Other benefit issues  →  Thread

Internal Process Reviews

Owen_Stevens
forum member

UC Adviser, CPAG

Send message

Total Posts: 586

Joined: 1 October 2018

Rethink’s recent report on benefit deaths and serious harm in the benefit system includes, at footnote 36, a reference to redacted IPRs released via FOI.  I hadn’t previously uploaded these as I couldn’t face the admin, particularly given the extent of the redaction.  However, given that these have now been cited in the Rethink report I thought it would be helpful to upload them here.

Note that the credit for their release should go to John Pring at DNS as his case (which led to this) meant that these IPRs could be released through FOI
 

Incidentally - the FOI cited at footnote 33 of the Rethink report can be found here.

[ Edited: 29 Nov 2021 at 10:22 am by Owen_Stevens ]

File Attachments

Owen_Stevens
forum member

UC Adviser, CPAG

Send message

Total Posts: 586

Joined: 1 October 2018

There’s 82 of them ...

Edit: Zipped file added >> https://www.rightsnet.org.uk/pdfs/Internal_Process_Reviews_July_2021_upload.zip

[ Edited: 3 Nov 2021 at 03:27 pm by shawn mach ]
Owen_Stevens
forum member

UC Adviser, CPAG

Send message

Total Posts: 586

Joined: 1 October 2018

The redaction is very extensive - it might be that a complaint to the ICO could have resulted in a closer review of the redaction applied by DWP, however this isn’t something that I ended up pursuing.

Owen_Stevens
forum member

UC Adviser, CPAG

Send message

Total Posts: 586

Joined: 1 October 2018