× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Universal credit administration  →  Thread

Informal lodgers… Use & Occupation agreements

Dan_Manville
forum member

Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 2262

Joined: 15 October 2012

I thought I’d pass this by the hivemind.

A case manager has just told me that without a tenancy agreement they won’t pay housing costs and although I don’t believe them it’s got me thinking, so…

UC claimant, lodging with a friend, no formal or documented agreement, just a handshake and regular rent payments.

I plan to provide bank statements showing those regular rent payments and maybe a copy of the tenant’s AST agreement.

That’ll do won’t it?  The Housing costs guidance discusses alternative evidence where there’s no U&O contract; I can’t find any additonal evidence requirements. Evidence that they’re paying rent is surely evidence that they’re liable when they’re obvs living there.

Of course the AST will probably be an off the shelf version with a “no sub let” clause which I shall look for closely and might yet skip it as the landlord is well aware they’re there. Even if that’s so; where she’s crashing there, a liability still arises under common law… doesn’t it?

Thoughts would be appreciated.

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and advice resources - Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 3211

Joined: 7 January 2016

I think they’re essentially a licensee Dan, see section 3 of our factsheet Preventing evictions

Absolutely no reason why housing costs can’t be awarded in such scenarios and from what you’ve said, there’s evdience to make the case.

Elliot Kent
forum member

Shelter

Send message

Total Posts: 3129

Joined: 14 July 2014

There’s no requirement that this sort of residential tenancy or license agreement be in writing. It isn’t really important to establish whether this is strictly a tenancy or a license as either can be covered by UC.

It’s also irrelevant that the agreement is or may be in breach of a “no sub-letting” clause. The agreement is binding between the tenant and the immediate landlord even if it places that landlord in breach of their own tenancy.

But yes you may run into evidential issues. I think you would have had the same issues with most LAs under HB too to be fair.

Dan_Manville
forum member

Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 2262

Joined: 15 October 2012

Elliot Kent - 20 June 2019 01:36 PM

I think you would have had the same issues with most LAs under HB too to be fair.

I’m glad to say that our HB dept are quite pragmatic in cases like this.

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK - 20 June 2019 01:33 PM

I think they’re essentially a licensee Dan, .

I did think that but UC doesn’t use “licencees” at all and terminology’s important so U&O will be the way forward while dealing with UC.


Thanks both for the input.

[ Edited: 20 Jun 2019 at 04:48 pm by Dan_Manville ]
Rehousing Advice.
forum member

Homeless Unit - Southampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 637

Joined: 16 June 2010

“Evidence that they’re paying rent is surely evidence that they’re liable when they’re obvs living there.”

I would try and show its commercial.

Is the rent set at a commercial level?  Has there been a previous payer in that property? Did your client previously pay rent?  Are his belongings there?

Elliot Kent
forum member

Shelter

Send message

Total Posts: 3129

Joined: 14 July 2014

Dan Manville - 20 June 2019 04:45 PM

I did think that but UC doesn’t use “licencees” at all and terminology’s important so U&O will be the way forward while dealing with UC.
.

The one thing that this agreement definitely isn’t is a U&O arrangement. U&O covers a situation in which the occupier explicitly does not have permission to remain in the property but pays damages for their unauthorised presence.

Licenses are specifically covered by the legislation - see para 2(b), Schedule 1, UC Regs and perhaps more pertinently ADM F2041.

Rosie W
forum member

Welfare rights service - Northumberland County Council

Send message

Total Posts: 471

Joined: 9 February 2012

Dan Manville - 20 June 2019 04:45 PM
Elliot Kent - 20 June 2019 01:36 PM

I think you would have had the same issues with most LAs under HB too to be fair.

I’m glad to say that our HB dept are quite pragmatic in cases like this.

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK - 20 June 2019 01:33 PM

I think they’re essentially a licensee Dan, .

I did think that but UC doesn’t use “licencees” at all and terminology’s important so U&O will be the way forward while dealing with UC.


Thanks both for the input.

Hi Dan - we’ve not to date had a problem with UC accepting a Shared Lives agreement as evidence of housing costs and that is a licence.

Well, we did have a problem but it was them paying too much not that they wouldn’t pay at all..

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and advice resources - Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 3211

Joined: 7 January 2016

Just resurrecting this thread to see if I can clarify something in a similar case please?

Woman and school-age son rent a room from a friend due to needing to leave current accommodation quickly. Again, no formal tenancy agreement, just an informal agreement to pay £X a week for the room.

Presumably the housing costs element is calculated under LHA rules but on what basis? They are entitled to two bedrooms but they’re only occupying one room - I’m assuming they can therefore be paid up to the 2-bedoom rate, is that correct?

Elliot Kent
forum member

Shelter

Send message

Total Posts: 3129

Joined: 14 July 2014

Yes that’s correct.

For UC, the LHA is only ever based on the number of rooms you need. What you actually have is irrelevant.

There could be evidential issues which could be addressed by drawing up a lodgers agreement.

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and advice resources - Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 3211

Joined: 7 January 2016

Elliot Kent - 09 October 2023 12:32 PM

Yes that’s correct.

For UC, the LHA is only ever based on the number of rooms you need. What you actually have is irrelevant.

There could be evidential issues which could be addressed by drawing up a lodgers agreement.

Thanks Elliot, I thought that was the case and I was going to suggest drawing up a written agreement, just to make things slightly more formal.

Stainsby
forum member

Welfare rights adviser - Plumstead Community Law Centre

Send message

Total Posts: 616

Joined: 17 June 2010

I have had lodgers in the past who have claimeed HB and I used an off the peg lodger agreeement

Here it as as a word document

File Attachments

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and advice resources - Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 3211

Joined: 7 January 2016

Stainsby - 09 October 2023 04:03 PM

I have had lodgers in the past who have claimeed HB and I used an off the peg lodger agreeement

Here it as as a word document

Thanks Derek, appreciated.