Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Universal credit migration  →  Thread

Claimants already getting SDP

‹ First  < 8 9 10

Tina M
forum member

Benefits Team, Stoke-on-Trent Citizens Advice Bureau

Send message

Total Posts: 34

Joined: 26 July 2010

stevejohnsontrainer - 19 March 2019 06:40 PM

From email response recieved from UC Policy Group today…

“...The issue / question you refer to below has arisen previously and the legal advice we have had confirms that ‘a person entitled to a benefit that includes the SDP, includes a person who meet the conditions for SDP but have not yet received it’.

So, if someone is not receiving the SDP as part of their legacy benefit (e.g. Income Support, Jobseekers Allowance (income based), Employment & Support Allowance (income related) and Housing Benefit), but following a change of circumstances that requires them to make a new claim to Universal Credit (as this replaces the above benefits), it is identified during the course of dealing with this change of circumstances that the claimant should be receiving SDP, as they meet all of the qualifying conditions but for some reason this hasn’t been put into payment, then these claimants will be prevented from claiming UC by the SDP Gateway and will be able to stay on / claim a legacy benefit, and the SDP will be added to their claim. These claimants will then only be moved to UC by the DWP as part of the managed migration exercise as some point in the future and will receive transitional protection.


Thanks”


Steve thanks for clarifying this I will share it widely with everyone :)

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and Advice Resources, Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 1790

Joined: 7 January 2016

We’ve been alerted to a rather serious problem with the SDP gateway for mixed-age couples that we understand DWP are currently working on to fix this pre-15 May 2019.

Say we have a couple claiming ESA with SDP in payment and on 6 July 2019,  lead partner reaches State Pension age, so their ESA claim must stop. They can’t claim Pension Credit due to mixed-age couples changes but they can’t claim Universal Credit either due to SDP gateway.

Younger partner can’t claim ESA as it’s been abolished but also can’t claim Universal Credit due to the SDP gateway.

These piece-meal ill-thought through welfare “reforms” are causing havoc and how anyone can maintain that UC is somehow simplifying the benefit system is completely beyond me.

Charles
forum member

Accountant, Haffner Hoff Ltd, Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 324

Joined: 27 February 2019

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK - 10 April 2019 12:46 PM

We’ve been alerted to a rather serious problem with the SDP gateway for mixed-age couples that we understand DWP are currently working on to fix this pre-15 May 2019.

Say we have a couple claiming ESA with SDP in payment and on 6 July 2019,  lead partner reaches State Pension age, so their ESA claim must stop. They can’t claim Pension Credit due to mixed-age couples changes but they can’t claim Universal Credit either due to SDP gateway.

Younger partner can’t claim ESA as it’s been abolished but also can’t claim Universal Credit due to the SDP gateway.

These piece-meal ill-thought through welfare “reforms” are causing havoc and how anyone can maintain that UC is somehow simplifying the benefit system is completely beyond me.

I believe the younger partner can claim ESA in this case. Art. 5A of the No. 9 Commencement Order (as amended by the SDP Gateway regs) allows this.


On a similar point, concerning the termination of some HB claims due to the pension credit changes, I wrote to DWP:

Art. 6 seems to apply even if a claim to UC is not possible due to receipt of SDP or due to reg. 4 of the UC(TP) Regs. This would then require claimants to reapply for HB straight after the termination. Is this correct? If yes, why is this being done?

They replied:

Thank you for raising this query. We are aware of the interaction of this policy with the SDP gateway and the possible impact on claimants. We are carefully considering the appropriate action to take for this claimant group and will make a further announcement in due course.

Your case is similar in that an ESA claim will have to be made by the younger partner, but in truth that has always been the case if they weren’t going on to PC.

[ Edited: 10 Apr 2019 at 01:07 pm by Charles ]
Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and Advice Resources, Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 1790

Joined: 7 January 2016

Thanks Charles, this really is needle in a haystack stuff isn’t it? This is going to cause chaos.

Charles
forum member

Accountant, Haffner Hoff Ltd, Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 324

Joined: 27 February 2019

Definitely.

I wish we could get clear confirmation about those who age into mixed-age couple status. I deal with quite a few couples claiming TC/HB who will find themselves in that situation.

zoeycorker
forum member

Welfare Advice, Johnnie Johnson Housing Trust

Send message

Total Posts: 88

Joined: 2 September 2013

i am bang in the middle of a mess here now.
I’ve tried to circumvent the system by reporting that my client who currently gets ESA with SDP has moved her partner in , to tax credits first, but they wont do anything until it has been reported to ESA and can show that SDP applies to both of them
so knowing that it wont - I am on hold to ESA in any case whilst trying to sort out a claim for UC but the gateway conditions wont let me through
arrrrgghhhhhh

unhindered by talent
forum member

Welfare Rights Team, Aberdeenshire Council

Send message

Total Posts: 256

Joined: 18 October 2013

zoeycorker - 11 April 2019 10:30 AM

i am bang in the middle of a mess here now.
I’ve tried to circumvent the system by reporting that my client who currently gets ESA with SDP has moved her partner in , to tax credits first, but they wont do anything until it has been reported to ESA and can show that SDP applies to both of them
so knowing that it wont - I am on hold to ESA in any case whilst trying to sort out a claim for UC but the gateway conditions wont let me through
arrrrgghhhhhh

Try the SDP helpline if you haven’t already 0800 181 4049 - ah, ignore me, I see you’re saying that SDP won’t apply

[ Edited: 11 Apr 2019 at 10:36 am by unhindered by talent ]
zoeycorker
forum member

Welfare Advice, Johnnie Johnson Housing Trust

Send message

Total Posts: 88

Joined: 2 September 2013

thanks I phoned them anyway - they just said to say that SDP doesn.t apply in order to get round it

Charles
forum member

Accountant, Haffner Hoff Ltd, Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 324

Joined: 27 February 2019

zoeycorker - 11 April 2019 10:30 AM

i am bang in the middle of a mess here now.
I’ve tried to circumvent the system by reporting that my client who currently gets ESA with SDP has moved her partner in , to tax credits first, but they wont do anything until it has been reported to ESA and can show that SDP applies to both of them
so knowing that it wont - I am on hold to ESA in any case whilst trying to sort out a claim for UC but the gateway conditions wont let me through
arrrrgghhhhhh

If the ESA claim is not ending due to income/work of the partner, you could try and argue (as discussed on another thread) that even if SDP entitlement has ended they still cannot claim UC and must claim tax credits.
Alternatively, if she claims HB, you should have a few days where there is still entitlement to SDP within HB even after he moves in (a change of circs in HB only has effect from the following Monday).

Katie McColm
forum member

Money Matters - North Ayrshire Council

Send message

Total Posts: 1

Joined: 22 October 2018

HB Anorak - 25 January 2019 11:55 AM

Nobody is legally required to claim UC.  Yu can just not claim anything if that’s what you prefer and, crucially, not claiming anything means that legacy benefits can continue under the same old rules if they would have done in the old days.  Textbook case is claimant in work on partial HB who loses their job and doesn’t want to sign on … so s/he doesn’t sign on.  Do the police turn up with a warrant requiring him/her to claim UC?  Nope.  It is a serious point because a lot of people delayed claiming in anticipation of 16 January and they can now have their HB backdated a month as I explain here.

 

I was just wondering if anyone had any cases where having made a claim for Housing Benefit on or after 16/01/19 have successfully argued for backdating based on this factsheet? We have a case where we have argued this and on guidance from policy at the DWP is that this is not possible based on the fact that Reg 83(12)  of The Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 is not listed in paragraph 9 of Article 7 of the Welfare Reform Act 2012 (Commencement No. 23 and Transitional and Transitory Provisions) Order 2015. We note the wording of Reg 83 (12) changed in 2016 to refer to ‘the claim is treated as made’ on the earlier date rather than backdating.

HB Anorak
forum member

benefits consultant/trainer, hbanorak.co.uk, east london

Send message

Total Posts: 1941

Joined: 12 March 2013

To Katie McColm: the Council is reading Article 7 completely the wrong way round.  The provisions referred to in paras (9) and (10) are the exception to the general rule that it doesn’t matter whether a claim will be treated as made on an earlier date.  Unless one of the provisions referred to in Article 7(9) and (10) applies, the question whether an HB claim can be made is determined as at the date on which the claim is physically made and it does not matter that the claim, having been made, will then be backdated under HB Reg 83(12).

The purpose of paras (9) and (10) was to allow a defective claim to be repaired and an initial enquiry to be followed through when a postcode switched to full service in between the initiation and completion of the HB claim.  In those cases, even though the claim was not properly made until after full service commenced, it could still be treated as made on the earlier date.

The SDP gateway deals with the diametrical opposite situation: where the law has changed to allow HB claims which previously were not allowed.