Search rightsnet
Search options







Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Housing costs  →  Thread

Housing Benefit review

forum member

Oddfellows Citizens Advice Manchester

Ministry of Justice

Send message

Send message

Total Posts: 9

Joined: 14 October 2016

My client requested a review of a HB decision. The review was carried out by the same decision maker who made the original decision. Shelter’s website states it should be a different decision maker. is this a procedural error on the part of the LA? many thanks.

HB Anorak
forum member

Benefits consultant/trainer -, East London

Send message

Total Posts: 2086

Joined: 12 March 2013

There is no legal requirement for a different natural person to look at it: all HB decisions and reviews are carried out by the Council as a corporate legal person.  It is regarded as good practice to refer revision applications to another officer, but that’s all.  The claimant’s remedy is to appeal to the Tribunal against the substantive decision rather than arguing about the process.  If they do appeal to the Tribunal, the case will probably at that stage be routed to another officer who will not want to waste his/her time preparing a Tribunal bundle if the decision looks like it can be revised.

Mike Hughes
forum member

Senior welfare rights officer - Salford City Council Welfare Rights Service

Send message

Total Posts: 2161

Joined: 17 June 2010

In reality it also depends which LA you’re talking about. The reductions in decision making staff are often staggering, even in the bigger LAs, so it’s often inevitable that decisions go back to the same decision maker.