× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Housing costs  →  Thread

Calculating days of absence - is it now the same for HB and for CTS

AMuller
forum member

Advising Communities

Send message

Total Posts: 9

Joined: 22 November 2017

Hi I have a client who had her HB and CTR stopped after she notified the local authority benefits office that she would go abroad for 4 week.  Annoyingly she seems to have been abroad for 1 day too long, as apparently the day she leaves counts as day of absence from home [CPAG handbook p 53 , footnote 60 KdeS v Camden [2011] UKUT 457 (AAC), which I suppose is still binding, even though it does not make sense to me ]

In KdeS, there was a difference between HB and CTR which used the words from the first full day of absence.  We don’t have the HB legislation book and I cannot find the up to date version of the CTS default scheme.  The Council Tax Reduction Schemes (Default Scheme) (England) Regulations 2012 (2012 No. 2886) still use the words first full day, but I wonder whether this has been changed now.

I would be grateful for any help.

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and advice resources - Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 3211

Joined: 7 January 2016

Hi Andrea, it might depend on whether your client is over or under pension credit age? If she is, it’s default rules that apply and 4 weeks absence would apply generally, if she isn’t, then it’s down to the local rules as they’ve decided them I think.

AMuller
forum member

Advising Communities

Send message

Total Posts: 9

Joined: 22 November 2017

Hi Paul

Thanks for your reply.

The claimant is under pension age and I am still trying to get details of that LA’s scheme. I think they applied more or less the default scheme for everyone initially, but this might have changed by now.
Anyway, I have now been made aware of some amended regulations SI 2016 No 1262 which uses the same wording as the HB regs (from the first day of absence) and not the wording from the CT regs quoted in the KdeS v Camden decision, which was ‘from the first full day of absence’.  So even though I don’t know when the wording first changed, I doubt that the LA’s scheme for under pension age is more generous than the curent default scheme.

Andrea