× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Work capability issues and ESA  →  Thread

Reg 35 - Charlton

CAR
forum member

Welfare Rights, Citizens Advice Rutland

Send message

Total Posts: 23

Joined: 27 June 2016

Hi All,
Hoping you may be able to offer some advice on this…
Charlton highlighted that the communication of the decision itself can satisfy reg 29(2)(b) if the client would suffer a significant deterioration to their health if told that the benefit claim was being refused; however is there anything that would allow this principle to be applied if a cl was moved from the Support group to the WRAG and notification of this decision caused a significant deterioration in a claimant’s MH?

Thanks in advance

Dan_Manville
forum member

Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 2262

Joined: 15 October 2012

CAR
forum member

Welfare Rights, Citizens Advice Rutland

Send message

Total Posts: 23

Joined: 27 June 2016

Thank you, will have a read.