× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Universal credit administration  →  Thread

High Court rules DWP’s universal credit deductions policy unlawful

shawn mach
Administrator

rightsnet.org.uk

Send message

Total Posts: 3777

Joined: 14 April 2010

From Shelter:

Breaking news: The High Court has ruled that the DWP’s Universal Credit deductions policy is unlawful.

The legal challenge was brought by Shelter acting for four former rough sleepers & by Hackney Law Centre in a similar claim.

More: https://blog.shelter.org.uk/2021/03/high-court-rules-dwps-universal-credit-deductions-policy-unlawful/

 

shawn mach
Administrator

rightsnet.org.uk

Send message

Total Posts: 3777

Joined: 14 April 2010

Shelter have just tweeted to say that:

The DWP has applied for permission to appeal, and this has been granted by the High Court.

https://twitter.com/Shelter/status/1372237037819035648

 

shawn mach
Administrator

rightsnet.org.uk

Send message

Total Posts: 3777

Joined: 14 April 2010

Judgment now available:

Blundel & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions [2021] EWHC 608 (Admin) (17 March 2021)

bristol_1
forum member

WRAMAS Bristol City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 241

Joined: 7 September 2015

So I have 2 cases where court fines are being deducted at a high rate, making up 30% of the client’s standard allowance.
What line of attack should I use when I am inevitably gatekeeped (gatekept?) when I ask Debt Management/UC to review the amount deducted for the fine? Should I move directly to complain? Does the fact that the DWP are appealing the HC judement have any bearing on whether they need to abide by its ruling?

bristol_1
forum member

WRAMAS Bristol City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 241

Joined: 7 September 2015

Oops!
Just seen on Twitter that DWP aren’t appealing!

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and advice resources - Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 3211

Joined: 7 January 2016

Tweet from Tom Royston about the case and no more appeals

https://twitter.com/tdroyston/status/1382639322596306946