× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Residence issues  →  Thread

KH v Bury MBC and SSWP (HB) [2020] UKUT 50 (AAC)

Martin Williams
forum member

Welfare rights advisor - CPAG, London

Send message

Total Posts: 770

Joined: 16 June 2010

UT has ruled that worker status is retained for longer than six months if claimant has worked for over a year and is involuntarily unemployed- there is no lawful basis for the test in what is now reg 6(2)(b)(ii) that such a claimant demonstrate a genuine chance of being engaged etc. after six months.

Judgment linked to here: https://cpag.org.uk/welfare-rights/resources/test-case/kh-v-bury-mbc-and-sswp-hb-2020-ukut-50-aac

Benny Fitzpatrick
forum member

Welfare Rights Officer, Southway Housing Trust, Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 627

Joined: 2 June 2015

Will there be a challenge? Any indications yet?

Martin Williams
forum member

Welfare rights advisor - CPAG, London

Send message

Total Posts: 770

Joined: 16 June 2010

Not had any indication of an appeal thus far.

Martin Williams
forum member

Welfare rights advisor - CPAG, London

Send message

Total Posts: 770

Joined: 16 June 2010

Just to update this- the SSWP did obtain permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal from the Upper Tribunal but have today notified the Tribunal and CPAG that they do not intend to pursue the appeal.

WillH
forum member

Locum adviser - CPAG in Scotland

Send message

Total Posts: 369

Joined: 17 June 2010

Is there any way if we can find out whether there’s going to be a DWP memo/HB circular about this?

All the paras on GPoW are still there in, for example, the ADM, in relation to retaining worker status (eg Chapter C1 on UC).

[ Edited: 20 Aug 2020 at 06:33 pm by WillH ]