× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Housing costs  →  Thread

LHA rate

Rebecca Lough
forum member

Welfare rights - Greenwich Council

Send message

Total Posts: 226

Joined: 23 November 2018

Hello,

I think I’m overthinking this, but grateful for a 2nd opinion. This is regarding UC.

Mum and adult daughter looking to take a private tenancy that is just in adult daughter’s name. Adult daughter is under 25 so normally shared accommodation rate would apply. However, she has a non-dependent so the 1 bedroom rate applies. Mum is part of her extended benefit unit, and also ‘due’ a bedroom.

Therefore UC calculation is based on two bed LHA yes?

Thanks in advance.

Charles
forum member

Accountant, Haffner Hoff Ltd, Manchester

Send message

Total Posts: 1417

Joined: 27 February 2019

Yes, that’s correct. See Paragraph 28(4) of Schedule 4 to the UC Regs.

Rebecca Lough
forum member

Welfare rights - Greenwich Council

Send message

Total Posts: 226

Joined: 23 November 2018

Following up on my own thread in the hope someone reads. UC have decided that essentially because Mum works, they are joint tenants. I know they have some discretion to allocate liability but can this be challenged? Tenancy agreement definitely just has client on it, with Mum as an occupier. I have stuck in an MR using the original legislation.

Prisca
forum member

benefits section (training & accuracy) Bristol city council

Send message

Total Posts: 201

Joined: 20 August 2015

why, if they are moving in together and at the same time, is the tenancy only in the daughters name instead of the a joint tenancy with the working Mum?