× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Other benefit issues  →  Thread

Human Rights Watch seeking case studies where automated decision making has affected claimants

Daphne
Administrator

rightsnet writer / editor

Send message

Total Posts: 3546

Joined: 14 March 2014

This project researches the UK government’s use of automated decision-making and other data-driven technologies to manage and police access to UC and legacy benefits. We are studying how DWP and local authorities are relying on these technologies to make decisions about whether claimants are eligible for UC and other benefits and how much they are awarded…

We need your help with finding cases that illustrate how claimants are affected by automated benefits decision making. These would be:
1) cases where claimants have experienced significant and unpredictable reductions and fluctuations on their payments as a result of income calculations based on the monthly assessment period or errors in the Real Time Information feed; and
2) cases where claimants have been called for an Interview Under Caution or otherwise investigated for benefit fraud or error.

Please see attached letters for more information and get in touch with Amos if you can help - .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

File Attachments

BC Welfare Rights
forum member

The Brunswick Centre, Kirklees & Calderdale

Send message

Total Posts: 1366

Joined: 22 July 2013

An interesting article about automated decision making and public law principles from LAG https://www.lag.org.uk/article/207441/public-law-principles-and-secrecy-in-the-algorithmic-state