× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Disability benefits  →  Thread

dual purpose assessments?

ClairemHodgson
forum member

Solicitor, SC Law, Harrow

Send message

Total Posts: 1221

Joined: 13 April 2016

S2uABZ
forum member

Money adviser - Aberdeen City Council Financial Inclusion Team

Send message

Total Posts: 130

Joined: 17 June 2010

We should escape this in Scotland as Disability Assessments will soon be carried out by Social Security Scotland.

Dan_Manville
forum member

Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 2262

Joined: 15 October 2012

The beginning of the end for discrete disability and sickness benefits?

It’d simplify the system… wouldn’t it?

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK
forum member

Information and advice resources - Age UK

Send message

Total Posts: 3210

Joined: 7 January 2016

Dan Manville - 12 April 2019 11:53 AM

The beginning of the end for discrete disability and sickness benefits?

It’d simplify the system… wouldn’t it?

For “simplify”, I think you mean “bring about further reductions in financial support for disabled people but make the private contractors very rich in the process” Dan?

Dan_Manville
forum member

Mental health & welfare rights service - Wolverhampton City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 2262

Joined: 15 October 2012

Paul_Treloar_AgeUK - 12 April 2019 12:16 PM
Dan Manville - 12 April 2019 11:53 AM

The beginning of the end for discrete disability and sickness benefits?

It’d simplify the system… wouldn’t it?

For “simplify”, I think you mean “bring about further reductions in financial support for disabled people but make the private contractors very rich in the process” Dan?

Curse my spellchecker!

EJ
forum member

Benefits advice line - Coventry City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 111

Joined: 29 June 2010

Client has contacted me.  She was maintained in Support Group for ESA in February 2019, without face to face but with loads of supporting evidence.  Her current award of PIP (Enhanced rates on both) was due to be reviewed in 2020, but, out of nowhere, she’s received a letter from PIP giving her both components at enhanced rates as an “ongoing award”.

Client wonders if the evidence submitted for her ESA has influenced this (i.e. a “dual purpose assessment).

I must say I’d not realised that the announcement last summer about the introduction of the “ongoing award” for PIP would mean that we didn’t have to complete another PIP2 before such new decisions are made.
However, whichever exercise is being undertaken and whatever vehicle the DWP have used to make this decision, on this occasion my client is tremendously relieved!

And, with the regular reservations, it’s lovely to share some good news

ClairemHodgson
forum member

Solicitor, SC Law, Harrow

Send message

Total Posts: 1221

Joined: 13 April 2016

EJ - 12 April 2019 01:37 PM

Client has contacted me.  She was maintained in Support Group for ESA in February 2019, without face to face but with loads of supporting evidence.  Her current award of PIP (Enhanced rates on both) was due to be reviewed in 2020, but, out of nowhere, she’s received a letter from PIP giving her both components at enhanced rates as an “ongoing award”.

Client wonders if the evidence submitted for her ESA has influenced this (i.e. a “dual purpose assessment).

I must say I’d not realised that the announcement last summer about the introduction of the “ongoing award” for PIP would mean that we didn’t have to complete another PIP2 before such new decisions are made.
However, whichever exercise is being undertaken and whatever vehicle the DWP have used to make this decision, on this occasion my client is tremendously relieved!

And, with the regular reservations, it’s lovely to share some good news

indeed

i should imagine in some cases it will favour claimants, and in others not.

probably those with long term well documents issues will be fine or better

those who, perhaps, have been on PIP but working may not be….