Forum Home → Discussion → Work capability issues and ESA → Thread
Reg 35 - Charlton
Hi All,
Hoping you may be able to offer some advice on this…
Charlton highlighted that the communication of the decision itself can satisfy reg 29(2)(b) if the client would suffer a significant deterioration to their health if told that the benefit claim was being refused; however is there anything that would allow this principle to be applied if a cl was moved from the Support group to the WRAG and notification of this decision caused a significant deterioration in a claimant’s MH?
Thanks in advance
Casts a pretty wide net for the application of reg 35.
Thank you, will have a read.