Anybody got any thoughts on how Clause 60 (formerly Clause 57) of the new Welfare Reform Act might affect this same scenario?
It could be said that restrictions apply because the continuing care would count as a qualifying service provided under relevant legislation for the purposes of the Act.
The status of the accommodation and whether or not there is provision of board (which make up the other two limbs of the act's definition of a 'care home') seems to be of lesser importance than a person being in receipt of one (or more) of those qualifying services, borne from public funds.
Where the services are discharged seems to be of little importance, expanding the definition of a care home or 'certain accommodation'.
Another loophole closed, or am I too pessimistic?
|