Discussion archive

Top Decision Making and Appeals topic #31

Subject: "reps" First topic | Last topic
jav
                              

Social services welfare rights, nottingham city council
Member since
29th Jan 2004

reps
Mon 09-Feb-04 11:05 AM

does any one have useful decisions that may show a client has a right to be represented by a rep of their choice and if they are not available for a particular date of hearing it should be postponed?

  

Top      

Replies to this topic
RE: reps, Mike-rob, 10th Feb 2004, #1
RE: reps, jean, 10th Feb 2004, #2
      RE: reps, jav, 10th Feb 2004, #3

Mike-rob
                              

Welfare Rights Supervisor, Darlington CAB
Member since
26th Jan 2004

RE: reps
Tue 10-Feb-04 11:14 AM

R v Social Security Commissioner ex-parte Bibi provides some help on an orbiter basis

In that decsision the tribunal had said in thier reasons:

“The request for postponement had been made by the claimant’s solicitor... However, the tribunal decided to try to proceed because of the urgency of the matter so far as the claimant herself was concerned and the inevitable delay which would be occasioned not only to the claimant but to other appellants waiting to have their cases listed. Furthermore, the claimant is represented by an employee from a firm of solicitors. A firm undertaking professional representation in this way should arrange matters in such a way that its ability to represent clients does not come to a complete halt whenever a particular member of staff is unavailable.”

The judge conluded, at para 18:

" ... there was simply no evidence before the Tribunal which could conceivably have justified it. This appellant had obviously dealt with Mr Norman throughout and he with her, and it is hardly unreasonable that a party to proceedings which are of importance to that party should want the person with whom she has been dealing to represent her. Mr Norman had made it clear to the Tribunal, at a time when the Tribunal could perfectly reasonably have fixed a date outside the time when he had said he was unavailable, that that was the position. It seems to me here that, on any view, the reasons given for the adjournment were insufficient. It is plain that the appellant did not have the sort of hearing to which she was entitled. I appreciate that there is no absolute right to representation, but there is an absolute right to be dealt with fairly. As it seems to me, when one knows the full facts, it is apparent that this appellant was not dealt with fairly in being compelled to conduct her appeal without representation, with the result, as we shall see, that her claim was rejected, largely on the basis that the Tribunal found she had acted dishonestly in the way that she had presented her claims to the Benefits Agency."

I'll e-mail a copy to you.

Mike Robinson
Darlington CAB

  

Top      

jean
                              

specialist support project manager, london advice services alliance
Member since
19th Jan 2004

RE: reps
Tue 10-Feb-04 12:35 PM

a copy of R v Social Security Commissioner ex-parte Bibi is available at -

http://www.rightsnet.org.uk/pdfs/bibi.rtf

  

Top      

jav
                              

Social services welfare rights, nottingham city council
Member since
29th Jan 2004

RE: reps
Tue 10-Feb-04 01:44 PM

thanks guys!!!

  

Top      

Top Decision Making and Appeals topic #31First topic | Last topic