It's possible CIS/1178/2000 (& CIS/1987/2000) may have no application for HB/CTB.
In the IS cases, it was relevant that IS itself was a "relevant benefit". I stand to be corrected, but I'm pretty sure neither HB or CTB is a "relevant benefit".
So, by all means argue it, but it *may* take an Upper Tribunal to sort this out definitively - one way or the other.
|