Has a decision been made, and if so what are they being paid?
Your clients can claim as a couple, indeed he can't claim as a single person, because any resources his partner may have must be takien into account. So, merely MAKING the claim as a couple won't endanger her immgration status.
But their applicable amount should be the same as his would be as a single person. (Which is what para 13A says). If, as I think, he is entitled to CB JSA then that means that he won't be entitled to any IB JSA because his income will be the same as his applicable amount (unless they have any housing costs or he is entitled to any premia)
It's not clear what JC+ have paid them, if anything. Obviously his contributions make no difference to their entitlemetn of IB JSA whether 13A is used or not! If they have paid them IB JSA based on a couple's personal allowance then they've been overpaid. I think I'd be inclined to the view that:
a) This is not a recoverable overpayment, as it is not due to any misrepresentation or failure to disclose on your clients' part.
and
b) An overpayment of benefit in these circumstances (the failure of the DWP to apply their own regs!) is not public funds.
But I think they should seek the advice of an immigration adviser as to whether it would be wiser to re-pay any overpayment regardless of its recoverabiilty in order not to jeopardise her leave application.
I don't think that there is any caselaw because the regs are so clear. I'd suggest that if they have been overpaid you write pointing this out and asking JC+ to revise their decision asap, but I wonder whether this isn't a confusion over the distinction between claiming as a couple and being paid using the couple's personal allowance.
|