Paul Treloar
Policy Officer, London Advice Services Alliance, London
Member since 21st Jan 2004
|
RE: Social fund decision re funeral payment
Fri 11-Jun-04 10:17 AM |
Surprise surprise, it may not be as straightforward as our Appeals Officer would make out - you have stated that your tenant's brother applied for the grant, as well as stating that your tenant signed the form - who exactly made the application? Is it the case that the tenant's brother may have been able to claim the funeral grant himself? When was the decision refusing the application made, because they may be in a position to lodge a review against the refusal (see http://www.irs-review.org.uk/irsreview/review.htm for more details on lodging a review). For basic information on eligibility for funeral grants, have a look at http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/life/benefits/the_social_fund.htm#Funeral_payments
You really need to get some expert advice and quickly on this matter - it could well be that the decision to refuse a grant is correct but I would prefer an approach that tests this supposition rather than assume anything. There is a CAB in Oxford (I presume Banbury Homes are located nearby - if not, you can try to use http://www.justask.org.uk/directory/index.asp?lang=en to find an adviser closer to you)
Oxford CAB 95 St Aldate's Oxford OX1 1DA Telephone 08701 264114 (24 hour automated advice) Fax 01865 202715 Opening Hours Monday 10am - 12 noon Tuesday Closed Wednesday 10am - 12 noon Thursday 2pm - 6pm Friday 10am - 12 noon Sat 10am - 12 noon I must admit to finding it deeply distressing that we are now seeing an increase in officials from DWP/IR posting on this site with responses that basically state that "No, the decision is clearly correct, there is nothing else you can do, get on with it" - as we all well know, there are many erroneous decisions made when people apply for benefits and tax credits, hence the need for appeals and the high success rate at tribunals. I do appreciate seeing the views from the other side - I just wish that we didn't see so much presumption of correctness.
|