Have a look here:
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ccmmanual/CCM15035.htm
Basically this is saying they have to be separated - & it is likely to be a permanent separation.
However, I think it should be perfectly possible to argue (if the issue ever arises) that they were separated from the 2003 date. In other words they lived separate lives but in the same house because he had no funds and nowhere else to go. Effectively I suppose he would be a sort of lodger, but on a nil rent basis. She might, however, be asked a lot of questions about co-habitation (separate bedrooms?), separation of finances (any joint accounts?), preparing and eating meals (were they still behaving as a family in this respect?) etc.
|