I have had 4 ESA appeals so far, two revised by the DWP on further evidence and two successful at tribunal. I’ve always said that we will have to run more reg 29 arguments for ESA than we did for ICB (exceptional circs – return to work, risk to health, etc) and strangely two of my cases were successful on reg 29, one revised by the DWP and one at tribunal.
I never do written submissions on ICB/ESA - PCA/WCA appeals. I just list the descriptors, orally, by their numbers in the schedules at the beginning of the hearing. Similarly, I’ll make a brief oral submission on a reg 29 argument. I will have already gone through the descriptors in some detail with my client prior to the hearing, they will be listed in the client's file and I will have the case in my head. The tribunal, myself and my client will make sure that all the evidence is brought into the open at the hearing.
The most important factor is a client’s credibility. If you’ve got that and the case itself is fairly good (without or without supportive medical evidence) then a written submission will not add much. If a client blows his credibility at the hearing then all the written submissions in the world won’t help him.
|