Discussion archive

Top Income Support & Jobseeker's Allowance topic #7471

Subject: "Single Parents and Training Courses" First topic | Last topic
pclc
                              

legal advice worker, plumstead law centre
Member since
16th Feb 2006

Single Parents and Training Courses
Mon 02-Nov-09 02:35 PM

We had a case in the past where an EU national SP was on JSA ( to keep her R2R ) and was then referred to attend a training course for 6 hours a day which would have caused childcare problems for her. Non attendance would have run the risk of a sanction and in that case we were able to negotiate that it was reasonable for her not to attend.

We now have another case - an EU national with a 10 month old baby who again is on JSA due to R2R pending an appeal against refusal of IS. She was referred to a 3 month course at 30 hrs pw attendance and now after 2 weeks is potentially unable to continue due to childcare problems, again risking a sanction if she cannot continue.

Given that SPs only have to be available for 16 hrs pw, how can JCP refer then for full time courses in the first place? Is anyone aware of any legal grounds that we can challenge this on apart from negotiation?

Many thanks!

  

Top      

Replies to this topic
RE: Single Parents and Training Courses, Paul Treloar_GB, 03rd Nov 2009, #1
RE: Single Parents and Training Courses, pclc, 03rd Nov 2009, #2

Paul Treloar_GB
                              

Head of Helpline and Information, Gingerbread, London
Member since
01st Jun 2009

RE: Single Parents and Training Courses
Tue 03-Nov-09 01:00 PM

Ah, the joys of discretion. I think you need to argue from guidance, DMG 34675 & 34676 refers:

34675 - DM should take into account when deciding good cause any caring responsibilities which would make it unreasonable for the claimant to carry out the JSD (Job seeking direction). This is limited to caring responsibilities and does not include other domestic duties.

34676 - If a claimant has caring responsilities for a child, in considering whether those responsibilities would make it unreasonable the DM should have regard to whether:

1. childcare would not be or was not reasonably available, or
2. if it was available or would not have been available it was, or would have been unsuitable due to the claimant's needs or the needs of the child.

Sounds like a quite ridiculous direction to me, if you want to pass details onto our policy team at GIngerbread, they would be interested in cases such as these.

  

Top      

pclc
                              

legal advice worker, plumstead law centre
Member since
16th Feb 2006

RE: Single Parents and Training Courses
Tue 03-Nov-09 02:25 PM

Thanks very much Paul - I am about to call JCP and will let you know the outcome.

The thing that interests me is why their continued entitlement to JSA should depend on their attendance at a F/T course when they only have to be available for 16 hrs pw employment.

  

Top      

Top Income Support & Jobseeker's Allowance topic #7471First topic | Last topic