The correct approach is to consider whether the child requires attention in connection with their bodily functions. Help with homework could count as help in connection with the bodily function of thinking, if extra help is needed because of a learning disability or mental health problem. Similarly, if a blind child needs someone to read instructions to them so they can do their homework, that could count as help in connection with the bodily function of sight and could help them to qualify for DLA.
If the tribunal excluded homework as an activity, without considering whether the child was receiving attention in connection with their bodily functions while doing homework, I would argue that was an error of law.
From the Disability Alliance caselaw digest: "R(DLA)1/07 (CSDLA/133/2005) states that functions of the brain are included within the term "bodily functions", disapproving of CSDLA/867/1997, CSDLA/832/1999, CDLA/4295/200* (123/01) and CSDLA/860/2000 which take an opposing view. See also CDLA/1983/2006 which concerns a person with dyslexia. "
|