× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Universal credit administration  →  Thread

UC prison

clive
forum member

Newcastle Council Welfare Rights

Send message

Total Posts: 122

Joined: 22 June 2010

I’m doing a list of changes in circs that would ‘trigger’ a claim for UC for those on legacy benefits in a full service UC area.

This is one of them (taken from DWP slide) about ‘remand’ which says if “Remanded in custody its a UC claim(normally in non UC areas it would be JSA to IS or WTC to IS).

However, Reg 19 UC regs 2013 basically says no UC arises for a prisoner unless (amongst other things) they were entitled to UC immediately before becoming a prisoner (which included housing costs).

You can see this appears to be a ‘catch 22’ where people on legacy benefits in a full service area can never get UC (housing costs) when they go into prison because they were not on UC immediately before they went into prison!

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/376/pdfs/uksi_20130376_310515_en.pdf

I can hear some of you say, “ask the DWP”. I have of course but haven’t had a reply. So if any one can help, I would be very grateful, thank you, Clive

HB Anorak
forum member

Benefits consultant/trainer - hbanorak.co.uk, East London

Send message

Total Posts: 2901

Joined: 12 March 2013

Yes, the way I read it remand prisoners are worse off in two ways:

- housing costs can only be paid for 6 months (as opposed to 52 weeks on legacy benefits)
- it must be a continuation of an existing award: you cannot make a new claim because you have been remanded in custody, which might be the very reason why you cannot pay your housing costs all of a sudden.  Whereas under legacy rules you could claim, for example, HB to cover rent because your income has been interrupted by imprisonment

zoeycorker
forum member

Welfare Rights Unit - Leeds City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 88

Joined: 2 September 2013

speaking of prison - will housing costs still be payable under the 13 week temp absence rules - (APA in place) for someone who has been sentenced to 6 months - but likely to be out in under 13 weeks - if he cannot meet conditionality due to being in prison ?

Daphne
Administrator

rightsnet writer / editor

Send message

Total Posts: 3546

Joined: 14 March 2014

Under the temp absence rules - Schedule 3 para 9 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/376/pdfs/uksi_20130376_310516_en.pdfa claimant is to be treated as no longer occupying accommodation from which they are temporarily absent where the absence exceeds, or is expected to exceed, 6 months - it’s a 6 month rule under UC instead of a 13 week rule. So yes they can get housing costs provided not expected to be in prison for longer than 6 months.

zoeycorker
forum member

Welfare Rights Unit - Leeds City Council

Send message

Total Posts: 88

Joined: 2 September 2013

fab - thanks daphne x