× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Work capability issues and ESA  →  Thread

Merging ESA with DLA

 < 1 2

benefitsadviser
forum member

Sunderland West Advice Project

Send message

Total Posts: 1003

Joined: 22 June 2010

Also remember it was never originally the intention to limit ESA for 365 days. This came in under the coalition 4 years after ESA was brought out by labour.

Mike Hughes
forum member

Senior welfare rights officer - Salford City Council Welfare Rights Service

Send message

Total Posts: 3138

Joined: 17 June 2010

Put aside the above discussion for a moment and look at this from the perspective of a claimant. Sadly, the overwhelming majority are unable to distinguish between PIP for long term disability and ESA for unfitness for work. They equate both to having a disability or long term health condition. From the claimants perspective this makes sense even when it might fill us with horror. Put that together with the IDS perspective of rationalisation, cuts, simplification etc. and it’s, sadly, potentially a winning argument.

John Birks
forum member

Welfare Rights and Debt Advice - Stockport Council

Send message

Total Posts: 1064

Joined: 16 June 2010

Mike Hughes - 05 October 2015 03:29 PM

Put aside the above discussion for a moment and look at this from the perspective of a claimant. Sadly, the overwhelming majority are unable to distinguish between PIP for long term disability and ESA for unfitness for work. They equate both to having a disability or long term health condition. From the claimants perspective this makes sense even when it might fill us with horror. Put that together with the IDS perspective of rationalisation, cuts, simplification etc. and it’s, sadly, potentially a winning argument.

You are right.

With the ‘withdrawal’ in 2017 of the WRAC there will be less confusion.

Peter Turville
forum member

Welfare rights worker - Oxford Community Work Agency

Send message

Total Posts: 1659

Joined: 18 June 2010

But hasn’t that always been the case from many claimants perspective? Destinguishing between the purpose of sickness and disability benefits. It’s now compounded by having two benefits ESA/WCA and PIP which are assessed by processes that look remarkably similar experience (even if the purpose and criteria are different).

The rhetoric about moving / assisting claimants back to work was a feature, to some degree, of all of the previous ‘reforms’. But maybe two points based schemes with the same assessment process (and a desire to save money!) makes it potentially easier for Govt. to make an argument about merging the two (and of course, thereby, assisting claimants into work) a bit easier to make?

Will claimants be the losers? Of course!

Mike Hughes
forum member

Senior welfare rights officer - Salford City Council Welfare Rights Service

Send message

Total Posts: 3138

Joined: 17 June 2010

Engaged my brain and found my previous post on this just over 2 years ago.

http://www.rightsnet.org.uk/forums/viewthread/5663

Feeling all unnecessarily and inappropriately smug now in a “simultaneously sad” sort of way 😊

1964
forum member

Deputy Manager, Reading Community Welfare Rights Unit

Send message

Total Posts: 1711

Joined: 16 June 2010

You feel as smug as you like, Mike. It’s allowed…and justified…..

Mike Hughes
forum member

Senior welfare rights officer - Salford City Council Welfare Rights Service

Send message

Total Posts: 3138

Joined: 17 June 2010

1964 - 07 October 2015 02:10 PM

You feel as smug as you like, Mike. It’s allowed…and justified…..

And now I feel humbled, or is it humiliated :)