× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Work capability issues and ESA  →  Thread

Housing Costs run on

Pete C
forum member

Pete at CAB

Send message

Total Posts: 556

Joined: 18 June 2010

It’s Friday so I’m not at my best so forgive me if this is obvious;

My client is a lone parent of a small child. She has had to leave her mortgaged flat and stay with family to get more support. The flat has been up for sale for nine months but no one has bought it, even after the price was reduced by £10,000.00.

She has continued to have the service charges for the flat paid by ESA but now she wants to rent a property of her own. There are no issues about domestic violence or hospital care and I can’t see anything in Sch. 6 of the ESA regs that would permit the service charges to carry on once she has stopped having any intention to return to the flat- am I right in this?

Edmund Shepherd
forum member

Tenancy Income, Royal Borough of Greenwich, London

Send message

Total Posts: 508

Joined: 4 December 2013

It would appear not.

CPAG p.430 (CIS/297/1994).

HB Anorak
forum member

Benefits consultant/trainer - hbanorak.co.uk, East London

Send message

Total Posts: 2906

Joined: 12 March 2013

Doesn’t paragraph 5(6)(c) cover it?  It’s the equivalent of getting HB on two homes after moving out of one with an unavoidable notice period.  I cannot see anything in either the HB Regs or the ESA Regs that prevents mixing and matching: the claimant will be liable to make payments in respect of two dwellings (albeit different kinds of payments).

CIS/247/1994 failed because the claimant didn’t occupy the dwelling at the start of the loan so it never came within the scope of IS in the first place.  This is different: the loan is already in scope and Sched 6.5(6)(c) keeps it that way for four weeks.