Sun 30-Mar-08 06:11 PM by Kevin D
3) Charities that provide both accomodation and care for their tenants are excluded from LHA. This is straightforward for schemes where supporting people payments are made but what if a charity provided the care without receiving supporting people payments? If they claimed exclusion from LHA, might a housing benefit office claim that the rent had been incorrectly charged, as the care element should be identified separately from the rent? However, if the charity paid the 'care' element out of charitable funds and did not include it in the rent, could this enable the scheme to remain outside LHA?
"Exempt accommodation" (EA) cases are not subject to LHA - there is no change to "exempt accom" cases. In short, if it EA now, it will be EA from April.
As to the issue of "supporting people payments", that in itself is not the test as to whether "care, support or supervision" is provided by, or on behalf of, the landlord. The tests are about reality and can be summarised as follows:
1) Are services provided to the claimant that can genuinely be described as "care, support or supervision" (CSS); AND is it more than minimal?
2) If so, is CSS provided by the landlord, or on behalf of the landlord?
3) If so, is the L/L a HA / charity / voluntary organisation?
If all the above hurdles are passed, then the claim should fall within the "exempt accommodation" exception. However, this does not automatically mean the LA cannot restrict, but that's a subject in its own right....
It doesn't matter how the L/L charges its rent. What counts is the reality of the situation.
My advice, for what it's worth, is to be straightforward and transparent about your charges and services. If CSS costs are being met out of charitable funds and not being passed on to the tenant, simply advise the LA accordingly. But, the LA may still want details of what is being provided by way of CSS to ensure the exempt accommodation definition is met.
Hope this helps.
|